Power v. Tallant
Opinion
Appellant’s brief contains a mere recital of the existence of a single error without argument or citation of authority. The single enumeration is deemed to have been abandoned. Andrew v. State, 229 Ga. 388, 389 (191 SE2d 841); Ezzard v. State, 229 Ga. 465 (192 SE2d 374); Rodriguez v. Newby, 131 Ga. App. 651, 655 (5) (206 SE2d *576 585); O’Kelley v. Hayes, 132 Ga. App. 134 (207 SE2d 641). There being no matter for consideration by this court, the judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
224 S.E.2d 534 (Power v. Tallant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.