Power v. Tallant
224 S.E.2d 534, 137 Ga. App. 575, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2533
Opinion
Appellant’s brief contains a mere recital of the existence of a single error without argument or citation of authority. The single enumeration is deemed to have been abandoned. Andrew v. State, 229 Ga. 388, 389 (191 SE2d 841); Ezzard v. State, 229 Ga. 465 (192 SE2d 374); Rodriguez v. Newby, 131 Ga. App. 651, 655 (5) (206 SE2d *576 585); O’Kelley v. Hayes, 132 Ga. App. 134 (207 SE2d 641). There being no matter for consideration by this court, the judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Power v. Tallant, 224 S.E.2d 534, 137 Ga. App. 575, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2533 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).
224 S.E.2d 534 (Power v. Tallant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. Cotton States Mutual Insurance
358 S.E.2d 874 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Morgan v. Citizens & Southern National Bank
299 S.E.2d 750 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Genins v. Geiger
240 S.E.2d 745 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Summerfield v. DeCinque
238 S.E.2d 712 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Post-Tensioned Construction, Inc. v. VSL Corp.
237 S.E.2d 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Cochran v. Baxter
236 S.E.2d 528 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)