Power v. Tallant
This text of 224 S.E.2d 534 (Power v. Tallant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant’s brief contains a mere recital of the existence of a single error without argument or citation of authority. The single enumeration is deemed to have been abandoned. Andrew v. State, 229 Ga. 388, 389 (191 SE2d 841); Ezzard v. State, 229 Ga. 465 (192 SE2d 374); Rodriguez v. Newby, 131 Ga. App. 651, 655 (5) (206 SE2d *576 585); O’Kelley v. Hayes, 132 Ga. App. 134 (207 SE2d 641). There being no matter for consideration by this court, the judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 S.E.2d 534, 137 Ga. App. 575, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/power-v-tallant-gactapp-1976.