Power v. Semmes

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Power v. Semmes

19 F. Cas. 1234, 1 Cranch 247

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedJuly 15, 1805

StatusPublished

This text of 19 F. Cas. 1234 (Power v. Semmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Power v. Semmes, 19 F. Cas. 1234, 1 Cranch 247 (circtddc 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT

allowed them to prove their attendance, and directed their .fees to be taxed in the bill of costs in the same manner as if served by the marshal of Virginia.

On foreign attachment, the interest was calculated up to the time of the affidavit made before the justice who issued the warrant. At the time of condemnation, the plaintiff's counsel. (Mr; Howitt,) moved for interest to be added to the time of the judgment.

THE COURT refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT

allowed them to prove their attendance, and directed their .fees to be taxed in the bill of costs in the same manner as if served by the marshal of Virginia.

On foreign attachment, the interest was calculated up to the time of the affidavit made before the justice who issued the warrant. At the time of condemnation, the plaintiff's counsel. (Mr; Howitt,) moved for interest to be added to the time of the judgment.

THE COURT refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 F. Cas. 1234, 1 Cranch 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/power-v-semmes-circtddc-1805.