Power v. Root
3 E.D. Smith 70
Opinion
The conduct of the defendant, when the bill of the plaintiff was presented to him for payment, in striking out the charge for a silk velvet coat with red ink, and writing-thereunder “Never got if, A. Root,” warranted the inference that he did receive the other two articles; and if so he was liable to pay. for them.
The witness, although he had never seen the defendant before [71] he presented the bill, identifies him. as the defendant in the cause, and whom he had seen conferring with his counsel in court.
The judgment should be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Power v. Root, 3 E.D. Smith 70 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1854).
3 E.D. Smith 70 (Power v. Root) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.