Power v. Rees
This text of 42 A. 26 (Power v. Rees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the learned court below contains a very satisfactory statement of the reasons why a verdict for the defendant was directed by the court. It is not necessary to enlarge upon these reasons. It is quite enough to know that when the defendant had allowed a period of fifteen years to elapse, without filing a bill for a settlement of the partnership dealings, he certainly cannot be permitted to set up the want of such proceedings as a defense in the present action. We are entirely satisfied with the opinion of the court on the motion for a new trial, and on it we affirm the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 A. 26, 189 Pa. 496, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/power-v-rees-pa-1899.