Power Train Components, Inc. v. United States
This text of Power Train Components, Inc. v. United States (Power Train Components, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
POWER TRAIN COMPONENTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee,
AND
THE TIMKEN COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________
2013-1474 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 11-CV-0153, Judge Gregory W. Carman. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
ROBERT M. KLINGON, The Klingon Law Firm, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
L. MISHA PREHEIM, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Depart- ment of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant- appellee. With him on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Direc- tor, and PATRICIA M. MCCARTHY, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was NATHANIEL J. HALVORSON, Attor- ney, United States Department of Commerce, Office of the Chief Counsel, for Trade Enforcement & Compliance, of Washington, DC.
WILLIAM A. FENNELL, Stewart & Stewart, of Washing- ton, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were TERENCE P. STEWART and STEPHANIE R. MANAKER. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, O’MALLEY, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 13, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Power Train Components, Inc. v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/power-train-components-inc-v-united-states-cafc-2014.