Power Probe Group, Inc. v. Innova Electronics Corporation

D. Nevada

Power Probe Group, Inc. v. Innova Electronics Corporation

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided April 22, 2025·No. 2:21-cv-00332·Unknown

Opinion

Marquis Aurbach Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Jared M. Moser, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13003 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 382-0711 Facsimile: (702) 382-5816 canderson@maclaw.com jmoser@maclaw.com

Law Office of KR Adamo Kenneth R. Adamo, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) 360 W. Illinois. Apt 620 Chicago, IL 60654 Telephone: (312) 527-0620 kradamo23@gmail.com kenneth@kradamo.com

Attorneys for Defendant, Innova Electronics Corporation POWER PROBE GROUP, INC., Case No.: 2:21-cv-00332-GMN-EJY

Plaintiff,

vs. STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXPIRATION OF PATENT-IN-SUIT CORPORATION, PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [ECF NO. 204] Defendant.

Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 154, Plaintiff Power Probe Group, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Innova Electronics Corporation (“Innova,” and with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: / / / WHEREAS, this action was brought by Plaintiff, which alleges, inter alia, infringement by Innova of United States Patent No. 7,184,899 (the “’899 Patent” or “Patent- in-Suit”); WHEREAS, the Court entered a preliminary injunction (the “Preliminary Injunction”) on October 25, 2023 [ECF No. 204] (the “P.I. Order”), enjoining Innova “pending a final determination on the merits, from promoting, marketing, advertising, selling, and offering, for sale the Innova PowerCheck #5420 (the ‘Accused Device’)”; WHEREAS, on March 13, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in Case No. 24-1166, issued a decision affirming the P.I. Order; WHEREAS, the ’899 Patent is set to expire on April 26, 2025; WHEREAS, the award of a patent “gives the inventor the right to exclude others from making, using, or selling the invention until the patent expires … ” Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., 594 U.S. 559, 563 (2021) (citing 35 U.S.C. § 154); NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing facts, and by application of the foregoing authority, the Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that Plaintiff’s right to exclude others from practicing the’899 Patent will and does expire on April 26, 2025; and, / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 1 the Parties further acknowledge and agree that upon expiration of the Patent-in-Suit, 2 there remains no legal or factual basis for the P.I. Order against Defendant to continue in 3 effect, such that the P.I. Order should be dissolved upon expiration of the ’899 Patent, to wit April 26, 2025. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED this 21st day of April, 2025. MARQUIS AURBACH KEARNEY PUZEY DAMONTE, LTD. 7 By: __/s/ Jared M. Moser By: _ /s/ James D. Boyle 8 Craig R. Anderson, Esq. James D. Boyle, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Nevada Bar No. 8384 9 Jared M. Moser, Esq. 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 1010 Nevada Bar No. 13003 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 10 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP 11 LAW OFFICE OF KR ADAMO S. Alex Long, Jr., Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) 12 Kenneth R. Adamo, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Patrick B. Horne, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) 360 W. Illinois. Apt 620 Lucas D. Garber, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) 13 Chicago, IL 60654 Tom BenGera, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) g = 101 South Tryon Street, Suite 2200 2 14 Attorneys for Defendant Charlotte, North Carolina 28280-0002 Z 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff a8 = 17 19 It is SO ORDERED, that the Preliminary Injunction entered by this Court pursuant to 20 the P.I. Order [ECF No. 204] entered October 25, 2023 shall be dissolved, with such 91 dissolution to take effect on April 27, 2025. 22 “hp, Jy I UNITED S rs ES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 DATED: April 22, 2025 26 27

Page 3 of 3

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXPIRATION OF PATENT-IN-SUIT AND DISSOLUTION OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [ECF NO. 204] with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court by using the court’s CM/ECF system on the 21st day of April, 2025. I further certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system. James D. Boyle, Esq. (Bar No. 08384) 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 1010 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 760-0177 Email: jboyle@nvlawfirm.com

SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP S. Alex Long, Jr., Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Patrick B. Horne, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Lucas D. Garber, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Tom BenGera, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) 101 South Tryon Street, Suite 2200 Charlotte, North Carolina 28280-0002 Telephone: (704) 375-0057 Email(s): along@shumaker.com phorne@shumaker.com lgarber@shumaker.com tbengera@shumaker.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Power Probe Group, Inc.

/s/ Jessica Madsen An employee of Marquis Aurbach

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marquis Aurbach Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Jared M. Moser, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13003 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 382-0711 Facsimile: (702) 382-5816 canderson@maclaw.com jmoser@maclaw.com

Law Office of KR Adamo Kenneth R. Adamo, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) 360 W. Illinois. Apt 620 Chicago, IL 60654 Telephone: (312) 527-0620 kradamo23@gmail.com kenneth@kradamo.com

Attorneys for Defendant, Innova Electronics Corporation POWER PROBE GROUP, INC., Case No.: 2:21-cv-00332-GMN-EJY

Plaintiff,

vs. STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXPIRATION OF PATENT-IN-SUIT CORPORATION, PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [ECF NO. 204] Defendant.

Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 154, Plaintiff Power Probe Group, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Innova Electronics Corporation (“Innova,” and with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: / / / WHEREAS, this action was brought by Plaintiff, which alleges, inter alia, infringement by Innova of United States Patent No. 7,184,899 (the “’899 Patent” or “Patent- in-Suit”); WHEREAS, the Court entered a preliminary injunction (the “Preliminary Injunction”) on October 25, 2023 [ECF No. 204] (the “P.I. Order”), enjoining Innova “pending a final determination on the merits, from promoting, marketing, advertising, selling, and offering, for sale the Innova PowerCheck #5420 (the ‘Accused Device’)”; WHEREAS, on March 13, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in Case No. 24-1166, issued a decision affirming the P.I. Order; WHEREAS, the ’899 Patent is set to expire on April 26, 2025; WHEREAS, the award of a patent “gives the inventor the right to exclude others from making, using, or selling the invention until the patent expires … ” Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., 594 U.S. 559, 563 (2021) (citing 35 U.S.C. § 154); NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing facts, and by application of the foregoing authority, the Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that Plaintiff’s right to exclude others from practicing the’899 Patent will and does expire on April 26, 2025; and, / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 1 the Parties further acknowledge and agree that upon expiration of the Patent-in-Suit, 2 there remains no legal or factual basis for the P.I. Order against Defendant to continue in 3 effect, such that the P.I. Order should be dissolved upon expiration of the ’899 Patent, to wit April 26, 2025. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED this 21st day of April, 2025. MARQUIS AURBACH KEARNEY PUZEY DAMONTE, LTD. 7 By: __/s/ Jared M. Moser By: _ /s/ James D. Boyle 8 Craig R. Anderson, Esq. James D. Boyle, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Nevada Bar No. 8384 9 Jared M. Moser, Esq. 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 1010 Nevada Bar No. 13003 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 10 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP 11 LAW OFFICE OF KR ADAMO S. Alex Long, Jr., Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) 12 Kenneth R. Adamo, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Patrick B. Horne, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) 360 W. Illinois. Apt 620 Lucas D. Garber, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) 13 Chicago, IL 60654 Tom BenGera, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) g = 101 South Tryon Street, Suite 2200 2 14 Attorneys for Defendant Charlotte, North Carolina 28280-0002 Z 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff a8 = 17 19 It is SO ORDERED, that the Preliminary Injunction entered by this Court pursuant to 20 the P.I. Order [ECF No. 204] entered October 25, 2023 shall be dissolved, with such 91 dissolution to take effect on April 27, 2025. 22 “hp, Jy I UNITED S rs ES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 DATED: April 22, 2025 26 27

Page 3 of 3

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXPIRATION OF PATENT-IN-SUIT AND DISSOLUTION OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [ECF NO. 204] with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court by using the court’s CM/ECF system on the 21st day of April, 2025. I further certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system. James D. Boyle, Esq. (Bar No. 08384) 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 1010 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 760-0177 Email: jboyle@nvlawfirm.com

SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP S. Alex Long, Jr., Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Patrick B. Horne, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Lucas D. Garber, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Tom BenGera, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) 101 South Tryon Street, Suite 2200 Charlotte, North Carolina 28280-0002 Telephone: (704) 375-0057 Email(s): along@shumaker.com phorne@shumaker.com lgarber@shumaker.com tbengera@shumaker.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Power Probe Group, Inc.

/s/ Jessica Madsen An employee of Marquis Aurbach

Power Probe Group, Inc. v. Innova Electronics Corporation, (D. Nev. 2025).

Pincite

Power Probe Group, Inc. v. Innova Electronics Corporation (Power Probe Group, Inc. v. Innova Electronics Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related