Powell v. United States
This text of Powell v. United States (Powell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6576
JAMES DEVON POWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOSEPH BROOKS, Warden, FCI Petersburg,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-37-2)
Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 18, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Devon Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Joseph McNulty, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
James Devon Powell appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to restrain or enjoin prison officials from
collecting court-ordered restitution and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Powell v. United States, No. CA-04-37-2
(E.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2004 & Mar. 24, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Powell v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-v-united-states-ca4-2004.