Powell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
134 A.3d 448, 635 Pa. 219, 2016 WL 1452101, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 801
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 13, 2016·No. 927 MAL 2015 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
*220 ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue as stated by petitioner is:
Should a Commonwealth agency be required to allow a suspended attorney to represent a party in its hearings and proceedings?
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel’s Application for Leave to File as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. Andrew J. Ostrowski’s Application to Intervene is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Powell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 134 A.3d 448, 635 Pa. 219, 2016 WL 1452101, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 801 (Pa. 2016).
134 A.3d 448 (Powell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Powell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
157 A.3d 884 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)