Powell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

134 A.3d 448, 635 Pa. 219, 2016 WL 1452101, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 801
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 13, 2016
Docket927 MAL 2015 (Granted)
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 A.3d 448 (Powell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Powell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 134 A.3d 448, 635 Pa. 219, 2016 WL 1452101, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 801 (Pa. 2016).

Opinion

*220 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue as stated by petitioner is:

Should a Commonwealth agency be required to allow a suspended attorney to represent a party in its hearings and proceedings?

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel’s Application for Leave to File as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. Andrew J. Ostrowski’s Application to Intervene is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Powell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
157 A.3d 884 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 A.3d 448, 635 Pa. 219, 2016 WL 1452101, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-v-unemployment-compensation-board-of-review-pa-2016.