Powell v. Tarantino Foods, Inc.

234 A.D.2d 989, 652 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13770
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1996·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erroneously concluded that the entry contained in the police report that the driver had left the keys in the vehicle is insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact whether the keys were left in the ignition of the unattended vehicle (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1210 [a]; Shea v Johnson, [990]*990101 AD2d 1018). Issue finding rather than issue determination is the function of the court on a motion for summary judgment. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Michalek, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell v. Tarantino Foods, Inc., 234 A.D.2d 989, 652 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

234 A.D.2d 989 (Powell v. Tarantino Foods, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stache Invs. Corp. v. Ciolek
2019 NY Slip Op 5856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Neu v. Heim Middle School
262 A.D.2d 1040 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Town Board of Town of Ellicott v. Lee
241 A.D.2d 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)