Powell v. State

303 S.W.3d 163, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 161, 2010 WL 528130
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 16, 2010·No. ED 92406·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Powell appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2007, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell v. State, 303 S.W.3d 163, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 161, 2010 WL 528130 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

303 S.W.3d 163 (Powell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bonds
303 S.W.3d 163 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)