Powell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Powell v. State

189 S.W.3d 651, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 2008, 2006 WL 998091

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 18, 2006·No. No. ED 86645·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Mark A. Powell, appeals from the judgment denying his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 motion. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Mark A. Powell, appeals from the judgment denying his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 motion. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Powell v. State, 189 S.W.3d 651, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 2008, 2006 WL 998091 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

189 S.W.3d 651 (Powell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.