Powell v. State
43 S.W.3d 454, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 649, 2001 WL 378987
Opinion
ORDER
Appellant, Mark Powell (“Movant”), appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Powell v. State, 43 S.W.3d 454, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 649, 2001 WL 378987 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).
43 S.W.3d 454 (Powell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.