Powell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Powell v. State

792 S.W.2d 55, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1024, 1990 WL 88970

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 29, 1990·No. No. 57216·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Hubert Powell, appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed appellant’s allegations of error, the entire record upon which they are based, and the findings and conclusions of the motion court. We do not find the court’s action to be clearly erroneous and find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We, therefore, affirm the court’s dismissal pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, which sets forth the basis of the court’s decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Hubert Powell, appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed appellant’s allegations of error, the entire record upon which they are based, and the findings and conclusions of the motion court. We do not find the court’s action to be clearly erroneous and find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We, therefore, affirm the court’s dismissal pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, which sets forth the basis of the court’s decision.

Powell v. State, 792 S.W.2d 55, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1024, 1990 WL 88970 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

792 S.W.2d 55 (Powell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.