Powell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Powell v. State

171 S.E.2d 657, 120 Ga. App. 582, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 867

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 4, 1969

Docket44567

StatusPublished

This text of 171 S.E.2d 657 (Powell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Powell v. State, 171 S.E.2d 657, 120 Ga. App. 582, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 867 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Haul, Judge.

The defendant appeals from his conviction and sentence of three years for shooting at another not in his own defense. The case was tried before the court without a jury. The prosecutrix testified that she was driving an automobile on the highway when she heard a shot and saw a bullet hit her car. The bullet struck the rear window of the automobile. At the trial she identified the defendant as the person who fired the shot. She stated she saw him through her [583]*583rear-view mirror when he fired the shot. Other witnesses identified the defendant as being in the vicinity of the shooting with a rifle. No motive was shown for the shooting. The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction. Studstill v. State, 105 Ga. 832 (31 SE 542); Clark v. State, 84 Ga. 577 (10 SE 1094).

Submitted Judy 9, 1969 Decided November 4, 1969. Kravitch & Hendrix, Aaron Kravitch, for appellant. Andrew J. Ryan, Jr., District Attorney, Andrew J. Ryan, III, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Jordan, P. J., and Whitman, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haul, Judge.

The defendant appeals from his conviction and sentence of three years for shooting at another not in his own defense. The case was tried before the court without a jury. The prosecutrix testified that she was driving an automobile on the highway when she heard a shot and saw a bullet hit her car. The bullet struck the rear window of the automobile. At the trial she identified the defendant as the person who fired the shot. She stated she saw him through her [583]*583rear-view mirror when he fired the shot. Other witnesses identified the defendant as being in the vicinity of the shooting with a rifle. No motive was shown for the shooting. The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction. Studstill v. State, 105 Ga. 832 (31 SE 542); Clark v. State, 84 Ga. 577 (10 SE 1094).

Submitted Judy 9, 1969 Decided November 4, 1969. Kravitch & Hendrix, Aaron Kravitch, for appellant. Andrew J. Ryan, Jr., District Attorney, Andrew J. Ryan, III, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Jordan, P. J., and Whitman, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 S.E.2d 657, 120 Ga. App. 582, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-v-state-gactapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack