Powell v. State
Opinion
1. The challenge to the array of jurors put upon the defendant, upon the ground the sheriff’s name appeared on the indictment as prosecutor, is without merit, since it does not appear that the sheriff, who [316] performed the mere ministerial act of summoning the jury, had more than a nominal interest in appearing as prosecutor upon the indictment.
2. No error harmful to the defendant was shown by the assignment of error upon the instruction of the court that if the jury saw fit to do so, they could find the defendant guilty and recommend that he be punished as for a misdemeanor, and, if the judge should approve the recommendaton, he would be punished as for, a misdemeanor.
3. The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction and it was not' error for any reason assigned to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
108 S.E. 245 (Powell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.