Powell v. State
This text of 108 S.E. 245 (Powell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The challenge to the array of jurors put upon the defendant, upon the ground the sheriff’s name appeared on the indictment as prosecutor, is without merit, since it does not appear that the sheriff, who [316]*316performed the mere ministerial act of summoning the jury, had more than a nominal interest in appearing as prosecutor upon the indictment.
2. No error harmful to the defendant was shown by the assignment of error upon the instruction of the court that if the jury saw fit to do so, they could find the defendant guilty and recommend that he be punished as for a misdemeanor, and, if the judge should approve the recommendaton, he would be punished as for, a misdemeanor.
3. The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction and it was not' error for any reason assigned to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 S.E. 245, 27 Ga. App. 315, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-v-state-gactapp-1921.