Powell v. State

66 S.E. 377, 7 Ga. App. 205, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 591
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 10, 1909·No. 2263·Published

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. A ground of a motion for new trial, excepting to the admission of the testimony of a named witness, is fatally defective, if the substance of the testimony is not set forth.

2. On the general grounds, the case is controlled by Plummer v. State, 1 Ga. App. 507 (57 S. E. 969). Judgment affirmed.

Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Griffin — Judge Elynt. October 8, 1909. Argued December 1, Decided December 10, 1909. Thomas W. Thurman, J. W. Shell, for plaintiff in error. W. S. Beck, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell v. State, 66 S.E. 377, 7 Ga. App. 205, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 591 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

66 S.E. 377 (Powell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Plummer v. State
57 S.E. 969 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)