Powell v. State

66 S.E. 377, 7 Ga. App. 205, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 591
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 10, 1909
Docket2263
StatusPublished

This text of 66 S.E. 377 (Powell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Powell v. State, 66 S.E. 377, 7 Ga. App. 205, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 591 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. A ground of a motion for new trial, excepting to the admission of the testimony of a named witness, is fatally defective, if the substance of the testimony is not set forth.

2. On the general grounds, the case is controlled by Plummer v. State, 1 Ga. App. 507 (57 S. E. 969). Judgment affirmed.

Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Griffin — Judge Elynt. October 8, 1909. Argued December 1, Decided December 10, 1909. Thomas W. Thurman, J. W. Shell, for plaintiff in error. W. S. Beck, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Plummer v. State
57 S.E. 969 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 S.E. 377, 7 Ga. App. 205, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-v-state-gactapp-1909.