Powell v. State

148 So. 3d 864, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17469, 2014 WL 5420890
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Powell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 So. 3d 577
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 27, 2014·No. No. 1D13-2536·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759, 765 (Fla.1996) (concluding petitioner failed to preserve her objection to the use of a peremptory challenge because petitioner did not renew the objection before the jury was sworn); Romero v. State, 105 So.3d 550, 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (citing Joiner v. State, 618 So.2d 174, 176 (Fla.1993)) (concluding appellant’s objection to the state’s exercise of a peremptory challenge was unpreserved for review because defense counsel affirmatively accepted the jury before it was sworn without renewing the earlier objection).

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell v. State, 148 So. 3d 864, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17469, 2014 WL 5420890 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

148 So. 3d 864 (Powell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melbourne v. State
679 So. 2d 759 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Joiner v. State
618 So. 2d 174 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Romero v. State
105 So. 3d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)