Powell v. State

602 So. 2d 695, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8542, 1992 WL 191163
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Powell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 649 So. 2d 888
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 7, 1992·No. No. 91-03103·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from judgments and sentences for violation of probation, possession of cocaine with intent to sell, and resisting arrest without violence. Appellant’s counsel has filed an An-[696]*696ders1 brief in which he correctly points out that the sentencing order for resisting arrest without violence, a misdemeanor, reflects habitual offender status. We must, therefore, remand this case to the trial court with instructions to delete the habitual offender provision from appellant’s sentence for this offense. DuBose v. State, 585 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Peterson v. State, 576 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). The judgments and sentences are otherwise affirmed.

BOOTH, SMITH and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell v. State, 602 So. 2d 695, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8542, 1992 WL 191163 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

602 So. 2d 695 (Powell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Peterson v. State
576 So. 2d 1385 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
DuBose v. State
585 So. 2d 1198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)