Powell v. State

364 So. 2d 495, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17017
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 1978·No. No. HH-111·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

MILLS, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant seeks review of his conviction for possession and sale of a controlled substance, to wit: heroin, urging that the trial court erred in denying his motion for disclosure of the identity of a confidential informer. The facts herein are virtually identical to those expressed in McCants v. State, 363 So.2d 362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), HH-217, opinion filed September 21, 1978, and thus the decision therein is dispositive of the issue raised here. Accordingly, since in our view the court did not err in refusing to require disclosure of the identity of the confidential informant, the judgments and sentences are AFFIRMED.

MELVIN, J., concurs. ERVIN, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell v. State, 364 So. 2d 495, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17017 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

364 So. 2d 495 (Powell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Breedlove v. State
364 So. 2d 495 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)