Powell v. State
138 So. 924, 24 Ala. App. 675
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Powell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Ala. App. 60 →
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.
The evidence is conflicting. This makes a jury question. There is no error prejudicial to the defendant, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Powell v. State, 138 So. 924, 24 Ala. App. 675 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).
138 So. 924 (Powell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.