Powell v. State
138 So. 924, 24 Ala. App. 675
This text of 138 So. 924 (Powell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Powell v. State, 138 So. 924, 24 Ala. App. 675 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.
The evidence is conflicting. This makes a jury question. There is no error prejudicial to the defendant, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
138 So. 924, 24 Ala. App. 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-v-state-alactapp-1931.