Powell v. State
This text of 63 Ala. 177 (Powell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We feel constrained to affirm the judgment in this case, on the authority of Pearce v. The State, 40 Ala. 720, from which we do not feel at liberty to depart. The sentence is heavy, if not oppressive, owing to the very large bill of costs taxed, for which it is difficult to account on any theory, other than that there must have been an unusual number of witnesses for so small a case. We suggest that, in our opinion, this is a case for executive clemency, at least, for a part of the punishment ordered.
The judgment.is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 Ala. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-v-state-ala-1879.