Powell v. Smith
124 A. 284, 279 Pa. 538, 1924 Pa. LEXIS 778
Opinion
Plaintiff appealed from an order making absolute a rule to show cause why a judgment entered on' a single bill, under seal, should not be opened and defendants allowed to make defense. Upon examination of the record and consideration of the arguments of counsel, we are not convinced the court below abused its discretion in making the order appealed from. See Tressler v. Emerick, 278 Pa. 128, and cases there cited.
Appeal dismissed at costs of appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Powell v. Smith, 124 A. 284, 279 Pa. 538, 1924 Pa. LEXIS 778 (Pa. 1924).
124 A. 284 (Powell v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tressler v. Emerick
122 A. 229 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)