Powell v. SAVE-A-LOT
This text of 774 N.W.2d 327 (Powell v. SAVE-A-LOT) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Shirley POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SAVE-A-LOT, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 21, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal.
MARKMAN, J. (dissenting).
I would grant leave to appeal to address inconsistent approaches in Michigan case-law concerning the treatment of so-called "black ice" cases. This is a matter that warrants the clear direction of the highest court of this State (latitude 41.9N°-48.0N°).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
774 N.W.2d 327, 485 Mich. 959, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 2596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-v-save-a-lot-mich-2009.