Powell v. S & G PRESTRESS CO.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Powell v. S & G PRESTRESS CO.

463 S.E.2d 79, 342 N.C. 182, 1995 N.C. LEXIS 536

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 3, 1995

Docket260A94

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 463 S.E.2d 79 (Powell v. S & G PRESTRESS CO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Powell v. S & G PRESTRESS CO., 463 S.E.2d 79, 342 N.C. 182, 1995 N.C. LEXIS 536 (N.C. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

However, as in Mickles v. Duke Power Co., 342 N.C. 103, 463 S.E.2d 206 (1995), we disavow the language of the Court of Appeals in its decision in this case suggesting that Restatement (Second) of Torts § 8A illus. 1 (1965) is illustrative of the type of conduct required to satisfy the “substantial certainty” test of Woodson v. Rowland, 329 N.C. 330, 407 S.E.2d 222 (1991).

AFFIRMED.

Justice ORR did not participate in the consideration or decision of this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI