Powell v. Powell

48 Cal. 234
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1874
DocketNo. 4,205
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 48 Cal. 234 (Powell v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Powell v. Powell, 48 Cal. 234 (Cal. 1874).

Opinion

By the Court:

The condition of each of the two bonds by the executor is identical; the burden of the sureties the same, and their consequent liability inter sese to contribution clear. The complaint, therefore, though proceeding upon both bonds, was not open to the objection that several causes of action had been improperly united. Nor was there a misjoinder of parties defendant. The sureties who are sued, as observed already, though executing separate bonds, assumed a common burden, and as being sureties on separate instruments, may be properly joined as co-defendants in the action. (Code Civil Proc. Sec. 383.)

The judgment is reversed and cause remanded, with directions to overrule the demurrers of the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murchison v. Murchison
219 Cal. App. 2d 600 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)
State Ex Rel. Shenandoah Valley National Bank v. Hiett
17 S.E.2d 878 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1941)
State Ex Rel. Connellsville By-Product Coal Co. v. Continental Coal Co.
186 S.E. 119 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1936)
Broast v. Interstate Surety Co.
205 N.W. 717 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1925)
Abraham v. Harry
1917 OK 213 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
People's Bank & Trust Co. v. Nelson
132 P. 493 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Elizalde v. Murphy
126 P. 875 (California Supreme Court, 1912)
Slater v. McAvoy
56 P. 49 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Botkin v. Kleinschmidt
52 P. 563 (Montana Supreme Court, 1898)
Stoner v. Keith County
67 N.W. 311 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Evans v. Gerken
38 P. 725 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
Gilbert v. Board of Education
45 Kan. 31 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1890)
Dugger v. Wright
51 Ark. 232 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1888)
Bernero v. South British & National Insurance
4 P. 382 (California Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Cal. 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-v-powell-cal-1874.