Powell v. Newman

Michigan Supreme Court

Powell v. Newman

727 N.W.2d 613, 477 Mich. 1033

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 2007·No. 132533·Published

Opinion

727 N.W.2d 613 (2007)

Harry POWELL, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
v.
Ron NEWMAN, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Johnnie Player, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant.

Docket No. 132533. COA No. 262621.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

February 27, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 10, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

727 N.W.2d 613 (2007)

Harry POWELL, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
v.
Ron NEWMAN, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Johnnie Player, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant.

Docket No. 132533. COA No. 262621.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

February 27, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 10, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Powell v. Newman, 727 N.W.2d 613, 477 Mich. 1033 (Mich. 2007).

Pincite

727 N.W.2d 613 (Powell v. Newman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Harry POWELL, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. Ron NEWMAN, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee, and Johnnie Player, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant.

Harry POWELL, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
v.
Ron NEWMAN, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Johnnie Player, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant.