Powell v. Lane
45 Cal. 677
Opinion
The facts of the case do not bring it within the provisions of either the first or second section of the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act of 1866; nor can the action be maintained under the third section, for an entry is not unlawful, within the meaning of that section, which was made peaceably and in good faith. (Shelby v. Houston, 38 Cal. 410-22; Townsend v. Little, ante, 673.) In this case the entry of the defendant was lawful, peaceable, and in good faith.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Powell v. Lane, 45 Cal. 677 (Cal. 1873).
45 Cal. 677 (Powell v. Lane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jordan v. Talbot
361 P.2d 20 (California Supreme Court, 1961)
Woodbury v. Bunker
98 P.2d 948 (Utah Supreme Court, 1940)
Dutcher v. Sanders
129 P. 809 (California Court of Appeal, 1912)
Goldstein v. Webster
95 P. 677 (California Court of Appeal, 1908)
Murry v. Burris
42 N.W. 25 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1889)
Phenix Mill & Mining Co. v. Lawrence
55 Cal. 143 (California Supreme Court, 1880)
Potter v. Mercer
53 Cal. 667 (California Supreme Court, 1879)