Powell v. Ingram
57 S.E.2d 315, 231 N.C. 427
Opinion
A careful consideration of tbe record and case on appeal leaves us with tbe firm conviction that tbe trial in tbe court below conformed to all applicable legal principles. As no error in law appears, tbe verdict and judgment must be upheld. Tbe question of tbe liability of Sanders to tbe plaintiffs was not at issue on tbe trial, and in consequence tbe judgment does not preclude tbe plaintiffs from suing Sanders in case they desire to do so.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Powell v. Ingram, 57 S.E.2d 315, 231 N.C. 427 (N.C. 1950).
57 S.E.2d 315 (Powell v. Ingram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shaw v. Eaves
138 S.E.2d 520 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)
Harris v. Fairley
61 S.E.2d 619 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
In Re Franks'will
57 S.E.2d 315 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)