Powell v. Holterman
200 A.D. 871
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich, Kelly and Manning, JJ., concur; Blackmar, P. J., and Jaycox, J., dissent, as they feel constrained by the decisions in Noreen v. Vogel & Bros., Inc. (231 N. Y. 317) and Boyle v. Cheney Piano Action Co. (193 App. Div. 408).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Powell v. Holterman, 200 A.D. 871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).
200 A.D. 871 (Powell v. Holterman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Noreen v. William Vogel & Bros.
132 N.E. 102 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)
Boyle v. A. C. Cheney Piano Action Co.
193 A.D. 408 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)