Powell v. Holmes

Indiana Supreme Court

Powell v. Holmes

36 Ind. 128

DecidedMay 15, 1871

StatusPublished

This text of 36 Ind. 128 (Powell v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Powell v. Holmes, 36 Ind. 128 (Ind. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

Worden, J.

Action by the appellant against the appellee to recover damages for the alleged shooting of a cow belonging to the plaintiff.

Trial by the court, finding and judgment for the defendant.

There is no question before us but the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding.

The evidence is palpably conflicting and, as we think, pretty nearly equally balanced. There is certainly no very great preponderance either way.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worden, J.

Action by the appellant against the appellee to recover damages for the alleged shooting of a cow belonging to the plaintiff.

Trial by the court, finding and judgment for the defendant.

There is no question before us but the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding.

The evidence is palpably conflicting and, as we think, pretty nearly equally balanced. There is certainly no very great preponderance either way.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 Ind. 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-v-holmes-ind-1871.