Powell v. Hines

180 N.C. 665
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 4, 1920·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

.'The authority of tbe Director General to promulgate tbe order limiting tbe recovery for loss of baggage to $100 on intrastate as well as interstate transactions is fully sustained by No. Poe R. R. v. North Dakota, 250 U. S., 135, and that tbe plaintiff is entitled to judgment against tbe railroad for $100 is decided at tbis term in McGovern & Co. v. R. R., and cases there cited.

Tbe plaintiff will pay tbe costs of tbe Director General in tbis Court, and will recover all other costs of tbe railroad.

Modified and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell v. Hines, 180 N.C. 665 (N.C. 1920).

180 N.C. 665 (Powell v. Hines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McConnell v. Payne
262 S.W. 72 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1924)
Hines v. Burnett
107 S.E. 657 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1921)