Powell v. Hill

152 S.W. 181, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 1186
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 19, 1912·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

MOURSUND, J.

[1] The amount in controversy in this suit was $175.75. The original petition appears to have been filed in justice’s court December 24, 1908. Appellant’s brief states that this ease was appealed from the justice’s court, but the transcript does not contain any transcript from the justice’s court, nor any copy of appeal bond filed in such court. The transcript from the justice’s court is necessary, as the record must affirmatively show a final judgment in such court before the county court would have jurisdiction of the appeal.

[2] If plaintiff recovered a judgment in the justice’s court, it is also necessary to show that appeal was perfected to the county court by giving appeal bond.

[3] In pursuance of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Wells v. Driskell, 145 S. W. 333, we shall- hold this case on our docket a reasonable time before disposing of it to enable appellants to make the necessary amendment of the record to show jurisdiction in the county court. The method of doing this is pointed out in said case of Wells v. Driskell.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell v. Hill, 152 S.W. 181, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 1186 (Tex. Ct. App. 1912).

152 S.W. 181 (Powell v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cotten v. Bier
169 S.W.2d 502 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Universal Transport & Distributing Co. v. Cantu
75 S.W.2d 697 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Perry v. Greer
223 S.W. 714 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Freeman v. Miller
160 S.W. 126 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)