Powell v. Hendrix

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Powell v. Hendrix

193 S.E. 361, 56 Ga. App. 595, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 176

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 28, 1937·No. 26317, 26318·Published

Opinion

Felton, J.

Under the allegations of. the petitions in these cases, the question as to whether the plaintiffs are precluded from a recovery because of the contributory negligence of the injured person is a! question for the jury, and it was not error to overrule the general demurrers. There is no merit in the exceptions to the orders overruling the special demurrers to the petitions as amended.

Judgments affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., amcl Sul ton, J., concur. P. M. Anderson, for Powell et al. W. T. BurlchaUer, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felton, J.

Under the allegations of. the petitions in these cases, the question as to whether the plaintiffs are precluded from a recovery because of the contributory negligence of the injured person is a! question for the jury, and it was not error to overrule the general demurrers. There is no merit in the exceptions to the orders overruling the special demurrers to the petitions as amended.

Judgments affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., amcl Sul ton, J., concur. P. M. Anderson, for Powell et al. W. T. BurlchaUer, contra.

Powell v. Hendrix, 193 S.E. 361, 56 Ga. App. 595, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 176 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

193 S.E. 361 (Powell v. Hendrix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.