Powell v. FCA US LLC
Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 AARON POWELL CASE NO 2:16-cv-02781-DAD-JLT
12 Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION v. 13 (Doc. 120)
14 FCA US LLC,
15 Defendant. 16 17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 120) The 18 plaintiff requests the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement. The Federal Rules of 19 Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the 20 Court. Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 22), it 21 “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 22 1997). Accordingly, the Cout retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement and the Clerk of 23 Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: September 1, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Powell v. FCA US LLC (Powell v. FCA US LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.