Powell v. Centers FC Realty, LLC

2020 NY Slip Op 2372, 120 N.Y.S.3d 766, 182 A.D.3d 495
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 23, 2020
Docket11411 301647/16
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 2372 (Powell v. Centers FC Realty, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Powell v. Centers FC Realty, LLC, 2020 NY Slip Op 2372, 120 N.Y.S.3d 766, 182 A.D.3d 495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Powell v Centers FC Realty, LLC (2020 NY Slip Op 02372)
Powell v Centers FC Realty, LLC
2020 NY Slip Op 02372
Decided on April 23, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 23, 2020
Acosta, P.J., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, Kapnick, JJ.

11411 301647/16

[*1]Claudia Powell, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Centers FC Realty, LLC, Defendant-Respondent.


Raskin & Kremins, LLP, New York (Rhonda Katz of counsel), for appellant.

Caitlin Robin & Associates PLLC, New York (Kevin Volkommer of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered on or about December 21, 2018, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence showing that the alleged sidewalk defect was a trivial defect and not actionable as a matter of law (see Hutchinson v Sheridan Hill House Corp., 26 NY3d 66, 79 [2015]; Trincere v County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976, 977 [1997]). In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact, since she did not submit any evidence showing that the condition was hazardous (see Forrester v Riverbay Corp., 135 AD3d 448 [1st Dept 2016]; compare Suarez v Emerald 115 Mosholu LLC, 164 AD3d 1130, 1131 [1st Dept 2018]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: APRIL 23, 2020

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rojas v. P&B Bronx Props. LLC
203 A.D.3d 525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 2372, 120 N.Y.S.3d 766, 182 A.D.3d 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-v-centers-fc-realty-llc-nyappdiv-2020.