Powell v. Biddle

2 U.S. 70, 1 L. Ed. 293, 2 Dall. 70, 1790 U.S. LEXIS 254
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided August 1, 1790·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Shippen President.

The court entertain no doubt in this case ; and, therefore, ought not to postpone a decision. The bequest was made to a person who was always called Samuel by the testator, though, in fact, named William; and whom the testator had nurtured and educated from his infancy ; when, on the other hand, he did not even know the person really called Samuel. The evidence to explain those facts was proper to be laid before the joy ; and their verdict perfectly accords with the law and equity of the case. Therefore,

Let the Rule be discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell v. Biddle, 2 U.S. 70, 1 L. Ed. 293, 2 Dall. 70, 1790 U.S. LEXIS 254 (1790).

2 U.S. 70 (Powell v. Biddle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scarlett v. Montell
51 A. 1051 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1902)
Tallman v. Tallman
23 N.Y.S. 734 (Superior Court of New York, 1893)
Appel v. Byers
98 Pa. 479 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1881)
Ayres v. Weed
16 Conn. 291 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1844)
Tucker v. Seaman's Aid Society
48 Mass. 188 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1843)
Coit v. Starkweather
8 Conn. 289 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1830)
Cozens v. Stevenson
5 Serg. & Rawle 421 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1819)