Powell v. Asten

36 Ala. 140
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

R. W. WALKER, J.

If it be conceded that the special plea, the demurrer to which was sustained, contained substantial matter of defense to the action, it is clear that the facts alleged might have been given in evidence under the other-pleas filed by the defendant. There was, therefore, no error of which the appellant can complain, in sustaining the demurrer. — Rodgers’ Adm’r v. Brazeale, 34 Ala. 512, and cases there cited.

2. It is not shown that the defendant excepted to the action of the court, in refusing leave to plead over. He cannot, therefore, assign it as ei'ror in this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell v. Asten, 36 Ala. 140 (Ala. 1860).

36 Ala. 140 (Powell v. Asten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Hall
131 Ala. 161 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1901)
Bright v. State
76 Ala. 96 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)
Hays v. Myrick
47 Ala. 335 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1872)
Tuskaloosa Wharf Co. v. Mayor of Tuskaloosa
38 Ala. 514 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1863)