POWELL, III, JIMMIE L., PEOPLE v

114 A.D.3d 1131, 979 N.Y.S.2d 883
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 2014·No. KA 12-02291·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S. Farkas, J.), rendered November 1, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sexual act in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal sexual act in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.40 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v *1132 Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]), and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence (see id. at 255; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present— Scudder, EJ., Smith, Centra, Carni and Whalen, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

POWELL, III, JIMMIE L., PEOPLE v, 114 A.D.3d 1131, 979 N.Y.S.2d 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

114 A.D.3d 1131 (POWELL, III, JIMMIE L., PEOPLE v) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lococo
699 N.E.2d 416 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)