Powell, G. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phil. Co.
This text of Powell, G. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phil. Co. (Powell, G. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phil. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
GREGORY POWELL, : No. 128 EM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2015, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are
DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that
hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the
filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Powell, G. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phil. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-g-v-ct-com-pl-phil-co-pa-2015.