Powell, G. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phil. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 21, 2015·No. 128 EM 2015·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

GREGORY POWELL, : No. 128 EM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, : : Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2015, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are

DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that

hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the

filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, G. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phil. Co., (Pa. 2015).

Powell, G. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phil. Co. (Powell, G. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phil. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)