Powell-Cerkoney v. TCR-Montana Ranch Joint Venture

877 P.2d 279, 179 Ariz. 180, 1994 Ariz. LEXIS 100
CourtArizona Supreme Court
DecidedJune 30, 1994
DocketNo. CV-94-0082-PR
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 877 P.2d 279 (Powell-Cerkoney v. TCR-Montana Ranch Joint Venture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Powell-Cerkoney v. TCR-Montana Ranch Joint Venture, 877 P.2d 279, 179 Ariz. 180, 1994 Ariz. LEXIS 100 (Ark. 1994).

Opinion

[181]*181ORDER

A “Stipulation to Withdraw Petition for Review” having been filed by counsel for Defendants-Appellants TCR-Montana Ranch Joint Venture, II et al and stipulated to by counsel for Plaintiffs-Appellees Constance J. Powell-Gerkoney et al,

IT IS ORDERED treating the stipulation as a Motion to Withdraw Petition for Review, and as such, the motion is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Review is DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall bear its own costs, expenses and fees in the above-captioned matter.

/s/ Thomas A Zlaket

THOMAS A ZLAKET

Duty Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In RE MARRIAGE OF REEDER v. Johnson
238 P.3d 123 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
877 P.2d 279, 179 Ariz. 180, 1994 Ariz. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-cerkoney-v-tcr-montana-ranch-joint-venture-ariz-1994.