Powell-Cerkoney v. TCR-Montana Ranch Joint Venture

877 P.2d 279, 179 Ariz. 180, 1994 Ariz. LEXIS 100
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided June 30, 1994·No. No. CV-94-0082-PR·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[181] ORDER

A “Stipulation to Withdraw Petition for Review” having been filed by counsel for Defendants-Appellants TCR-Montana Ranch Joint Venture, II et al and stipulated to by counsel for Plaintiffs-Appellees Constance J. Powell-Gerkoney et al,

IT IS ORDERED treating the stipulation as a Motion to Withdraw Petition for Review, and as such, the motion is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Review is DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall bear its own costs, expenses and fees in the above-captioned matter.

/s/ Thomas A Zlaket

THOMAS A ZLAKET

Duty Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell-Cerkoney v. TCR-Montana Ranch Joint Venture, 877 P.2d 279, 179 Ariz. 180, 1994 Ariz. LEXIS 100 (Ark. 1994).

877 P.2d 279 (Powell-Cerkoney v. TCR-Montana Ranch Joint Venture) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In RE MARRIAGE OF REEDER v. Johnson
238 P.3d 123 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2010)