Powell-Burko v. Burko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Powell-Burko v. Burko

251 A.D.2d 565, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7570

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D.2d 565 (Powell-Burko v. Burko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Powell-Burko v. Burko, 251 A.D.2d 565, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered September 25, 1997, and the defendant husband cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied his cross motion for an award of sanctions and attorney’s fees.

Ordered that the appeal by the plaintiff is dismissed as withdrawn; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as cross-appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the appellant-respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the court did not err when it denied the husband’s motion for an award of sanctions and attorney’s fees. Sullivan, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered September 25, 1997, and the defendant husband cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied his cross motion for an award of sanctions and attorney’s fees.

Ordered that the appeal by the plaintiff is dismissed as withdrawn; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as cross-appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the appellant-respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the court did not err when it denied the husband’s motion for an award of sanctions and attorney’s fees. Sullivan, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 565, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-burko-v-burko-nyappdiv-1998.