Poveromo v. Incorporated Village of Nissequogue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Poveromo v. Incorporated Village of Nissequogue

293 A.D.2d 546, 739 N.Y.S.2d 843, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3538

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 293 A.D.2d 546 (Poveromo v. Incorporated Village of Nissequogue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poveromo v. Incorporated Village of Nissequogue, 293 A.D.2d 546, 739 N.Y.S.2d 843, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3538 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondents to accept, hear, and decide the petitioner’s appeal from a determination of the Village of Nissequogue Building Inspector, dated January 11, 2000, denying an application for a building permit, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated December 26, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly found that the petitioner’s appeal from the determination of the Village of Nissequogue Building Inspector was time barred (see Village Law § 7-712-a [5] [b]).

[547]*547The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Feuerstein, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondents to accept, hear, and decide the petitioner’s appeal from a determination of the Village of Nissequogue Building Inspector, dated January 11, 2000, denying an application for a building permit, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated December 26, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly found that the petitioner’s appeal from the determination of the Village of Nissequogue Building Inspector was time barred (see Village Law § 7-712-a [5] [b]).

[547]*547The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Feuerstein, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 A.D.2d 546, 739 N.Y.S.2d 843, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poveromo-v-incorporated-village-of-nissequogue-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack