Pouyan v. Hoppmann Corp.

16 F.3d 411, 1994 WL 31415
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 1994·No. 93-2307·Published

Opinion

16 F.3d 411
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Koosha POUYAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HOPPMANN CORPORATION; Mike East; Barbara Ozark; Cary
McConnell; Bart Hulsbrink; Ron McBride, the
transferred engineer from Chantilly to
Lynchburg, Virginia,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-2307.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 20, 1994.
Decided Feb. 2, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-93-29-L)

Koosha Pouyan, appellant pro se.

William Ralph Chambers, Watt, Tieder & Hoffar, McLean, VA, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief in this employment discrimination action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pouyan v. Hoppmann Corporation, No. CA-93-29-L (W.D. Va. Oct. 4, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pouyan v. Hoppmann Corp., 16 F.3d 411, 1994 WL 31415 (4th Cir. 1994).

16 F.3d 411 (Pouyan v. Hoppmann Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.