Pouy v. Mandia

234 A.D. 897
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Judgment in so far as appealed from modified so as to extend the injunctive relief accorded herein to the bona fide tenants and guests of the owners of any portions of parcel A, and by eliminating the provision excluding tenants, lessees or licensees of said owners, aDd as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. The easement herein is appurtenant to the land and its beneficial enjoyment accrues not only to the owners of portions of parcel A but to bona fide tenants and guests of such owners. The regulations prescribed by the defendants to enable them to identify those who are rightfully entitled to enjoy the easement are reasonable and proper. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and conclusions should be made in accordance herewith. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pouy v. Mandia, 234 A.D. 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

234 A.D. 897 (Pouy v. Mandia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Menucha of Nyack v. Fisher
110 A.D.3d 1037 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Gowen v. Cote
875 S.W.2d 637 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994)
H. H. Apartments, Inc. v. Beachcliff Realty Corp.
8 A.D.2d 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Brearton v. Fina
3 Misc. 2d 1 (New York County Courts, 1956)