Poux v. FCI Bennettsville SC

446 F. App'x 577
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Poux v. FCI Bennettsville SC. Read the opinion of the Court — 418 F. App'x 157
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 16, 2011·No. No. 11-6605·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ernesto Poux, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Poux v. FCI, No. 4:10-cv-00433-HFF, 2010 WL 5141708 (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poux v. FCI Bennettsville SC, 446 F. App'x 577 (4th Cir. 2011).

446 F. App'x 577 (Poux v. FCI Bennettsville SC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related