Poux v. Drew

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 21, 2011
Docket10-7558
StatusUnpublished

This text of Poux v. Drew (Poux v. Drew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poux v. Drew, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7558

ERNESTO POUX, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DARLENE DREW, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (4:10-cv-01684-HFF)

Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 21, 2011

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernesto Poux, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ernesto Poux, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241

(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Poux v. Drew, No. 4:10-cv-01684-

HFF (D.S.C. Oct. 25, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Poux v. Drew, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poux-v-drew-ca4-2011.