Pourney v. Barron

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pourney v. Barron

851 S.W.2d 130, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 651, 1993 WL 137757

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 4, 1993·No. No. 62019·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s decision to set aside a default judgment entered against defendant. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s decision to set aside a default judgment entered against defendant. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Pourney v. Barron, 851 S.W.2d 130, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 651, 1993 WL 137757 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

851 S.W.2d 130 (Pourney v. Barron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.