Pourbabai v. Mineta
This text of Pourbabai v. Mineta (Pourbabai v. Mineta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
__________________________________________ ) BEN POURBABAI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1554 (PLF) ) RAY LAHOOD, Secretary, ) United States Department of Transportation, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________)
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion issued this same day, it is
hereby
ORDERED that defendant’s motion for an extension of time in which to file a
response to plaintiff’s objections to Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola’s Second Report and
Recommendation, dated February 20, 2009 [50] is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS and APPROVES Magistrate
Judge John M. Facciola’s Second Report and Recommendation, dated February 20, 2009; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [41] is
GRANTED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in defendant’s favor with respect
to Counts II, III, IV and V of plaintiff’s Amended Complaint; it is FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED in its entirety; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall remove this case from
the docket of this Court. This is a final appealable order. See FED . R. APP . P. 4(a).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge
DATE: March 25, 2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pourbabai v. Mineta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pourbabai-v-mineta-dcd-2009.