Poundstone v. Maben
This text of 5 Colo. App. 70 (Poundstone v. Maben) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was brought up with the preceding one of Poundstone v. Holt, ante, 66, and while of necessity two records were filed, both cases were treated and argued as one, though separate judgments must be entered. If the record in the present case may be treated as containing all the matters exhibited by that filed in the preceding cause, the same judgment must consequently be entered. For the reasons expressed for the affirmance of the judgment in the preceding cause, this will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Colo. App. 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poundstone-v-maben-coloctapp-1894.