Pound v. Pleister
This text of 153 A. 907 (Pound v. Pleister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action for specific performance and the learned vice-chancellor dismissed the bill of complaint, from which decree so advised the complainant below appeals.
Without going into details it is sufficient to say that we conclude that the opinion of this court in Lennig v. OceanCity Association, 41 N.J. Eq. 606, is controlling and for that reason the decree below is affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 578
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 A. 907, 107 N.J. Eq. 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pound-v-pleister-nj-1931.